Thank you for the
opportunity to present to you today regarding the philosophy of independent
living. I am Josie Torrez and I work
for the Kansas Association of Centers for Independent Living (KACIL).
KACIL represents the 13
Centers for Independent Living (CIL’s) around the state. Our mission is to coordinate efforts within
Kansas, the United States, and internationally to the extent that these efforts
will further independent living for all.
KACIL will advocate for the civil rights of Kansans with disabilities,
regardless of age.
CIL’s are community based,
not for profit organizations that have
federal and state requirements that their governing board and a majority
of all staff be persons with disabilities.
This concept is known as consumer control.
There are 13 CIL’s in Kansas
and each provide at least five core services, information and referral, peer
support, independent living skills training, deinstitutionalization and systems
and individual advocacy. Each CIL,
based on input from consumers in their community and direction of their board
may also provide other services, including, but not limited to payroll agents
for self directed services under the HCBS waivers, assistance and advocacy for
transportation, housing, employment, education, recreation and other areas as
defined by people with disabilities in their area.
Unlike other organizations
who focus on a particular disability or age, CIL’s provide assistance to people
with all disabilities and all ages.
The independent living
movement, which is responsible for the development of CIL’s was an outgrowth of
the civil rights movement. The idea was that we look at disabled people
differently than we had in the past.
The following chart describes the change ion thinking that the
Independent living movement proposed and still supports. (See Chart A)
The Chart
I.L CHART: THE DIFFERENCE
|
|
REHAB MODEL |
I.L. MODEL |
|
Definitions Of Problems |
Physical or mental
impairments; Something is wrong with the person |
Dependence of
professionals, family members and others and environments; lack of legal
protections or recognition of inherent worth of disabled people. |
|
Locus Of Problems |
In individual (who is
broken or sick and needs fixing or curing. |
In environments and
perceptions. |
|
Social Roles |
Patients, clients, charity
recipients, non-existent. |
Family and community
members, customers, co-workers, advocates, same as anyone else. |
|
Solutions To Problems |
Professional and volunteer
interventions and treatments. |
Equitable employment,
political, educational, and cultural options. |
|
Who Controls |
Professional and / or
volunteer. |
Individual or group of
individual’s choice. |
|
Desired Outcome |
Fit into the program No social misfits. |
Employment, housing,
community involvement, same as everyone. |
It is our opinion that the State, in an effort to maximize federal
funds, has made “Medicaid Junkies” out of many people with disabilities and
families. Just as with the welfare
system, we have designed a safety net that traps people and makes them believe
they can do little to improve their situation.
We suggest that in this time
of budget crisis, we begin to revisit the chart and determine what we can do to
empower people, rather than trapping them into dependence. Advocates, consumers, the state and
legislators need to work together to develop solutions that are based on the
dignity and ability of disabled people, not on their deficits.
We need to redesign systems
so that they provide supports when needed and teaching tools whenever possible
to minimize or eliminate dependency on the system and maximize independence.
Our hero in the independent
living movement, Justin Dart Jr. said that “Empowerment is when we say no to
the primitive illusion that society, government, the free market; the public
media are some sort of paternalistic super gods that can give us truth,
equality and prosperity.”
Our freedoms will come not
only when we are released from nursing facilities, but when we are employed
with health care and do not have to worry about our services being cut because
the state is short of funding. We, the
disabled community must work with you to change systems that discriminate, and
minimize us and we must work together to ensure that systems are there as
supports, not nets.
How do we accomplish these
grand objectives? The answers will not
be achieved today or tomorrow, but we can take steps to the solutions. KACIL
recommendations include:
1. This legislature is to be
commended for the great success of the Medicaid Buy In program where people
have the option of returning to employment and can keep their medical card for
health insurance and pay a premium for the card, based on their income. Over
600 Kansans are taking advantage of the program which began last July.
SRS and advocates have been
working together but have been unable to include Personal Assistance services
as an optional service that people can use under the medical card. That means that people who use wheelchairs
or need an assistant for other reasons cannot use the program yet. One of the
main barriers is that the federal government will not allow the State to define
“work”. We are advocating that the
definition of who is eligible to receive PAS under this program be people who
work in an integrated work setting for at least 20 hours a month.
Without that definition, a
person on the waiting list for HCBS services could apply to the Medicaid buy in
program, work one hour a month and be eligible for PAS services. As advocates we recognize that would put the
budget in danger and we are opposed to such a situation. We will advocate for a change in Federal
Regulations, but we ask that this body write to our Senators and Congressmen
and to CMS and to SSA and request that they allow for a definition of work as
part of the Medicaid Buy In program that will define work as at least 20 hours
per month.
2. Review funding sources
for people with developmental disabilities.
There is a strong disincentive for people with mental retardation and
other developmental disabilities to become independent. The majority of all funding is tied up in
matching the waiver using Title XIX funds.
The regulations written around that funding source give very little
options for community providers to be reimbursed for teaching people to become
independent. Rules and regulations encourage
and support dependency models.
KACIL recommends a review of
programs that were implemented by community providers prior to the development
of the current funding systems. There
were programs out there that fostered independence. Direct SRS to provide funding for model programs that are
effective at promoting independence.
They work, but they must be funded.
KACIL believes that current funding can be used. It will require a change in regulations and
in thinking.
We must also look at the invasive and sometimes discriminatory
regulations used as part of the DD Reform Act that prevent Community Based
Agencies from being reimbursed for providing real integrated services for
people with developmental disabilities.
KACIL has discussed the
option of adding a service called transitional living to the PD Waiver. This
service would allow the opportunity for people to receive training for a period
of time to learn to complete tasks for themselves and then complete waiver
services. This will not work for every
individual, but we believe that some people could reduce their hours of
Personal assistance services and some may even be able to leave waiver
services.
By offering transition
services to people for 6 months with the intent of teaching them to do tasks
themselves or getting OT or PT evaluations to determine equipment which would
allow them to do tasks themselves we will be helping people off the system
instead of teaching them to be dependent on the system..
These three important
recommendations will move people with disabilities to less dependence on the
system that will and can not always be there.
We as a disability movement will never be free and equal as long as we
depend on “other people’s money”. The
I. L. philosophy is one of consumer control, not government control. KACIL wants to assist in any way we can to
offer incentives and support to assist people with disabilities to achieve the
same American dream that we all have.
Thank you for the
opportunity to present to you today. I would be happy to stand for questions.
Click
here to return to KACIL home Page