House Appropriations Sub
Committee on
Social and Rehabilitation
Services
Representative Brenda
Landwehr, Chair
February 25th,
2003
Thank you
for the opportunity to present to you today regarding the budget for Social and
Rehabilitation Services. I am Gina
McDonald and I work for the Kansas Association of Centers for Independent
Living (KACIL). We are also members of
the “Big Tent” Coalition and support their goals to increase revenue to
adequately fund needed social services.
KACIL
represents the 13 Centers for Independent Living (CIL’s) around the state. Our mission is to coordinate efforts within
Kansas, the United States, and internationally to the extent that these efforts
will further independent living for all.
KACIL will advocate for the civil rights of Kansans with disabilities,
regardless of age.
Of the 13
CIL’s in the state, the Centers in Kansas City, Lawrence, Topeka, and Hays
receive funding from the Federal Government under a grant for the Department of
Education of approximately $200,000.00.
The Center in Atchison also recently started receiving
Federal Funding through a sub contract with the Topeka Independent Living
Resource Center.
All the CIL’s receive state (SGF) funding to provide 5 core
services. The total SGF for all 13 CIL's is less than two million dollars. Some of the CIL’s have used part of that
funding as a match for Title I grants, which are grants through Kansas SRS,
Rehabilitation services to assist people with disabilities to find employment.
CIL’s and Home Health Agencies provide payroll agent
services for people who choose to self direct their Personal Assistance
Services on all waivers. Both entities
may also provide Independent Living Counseling for people on the Physical
Disabilities Waiver. Other waivers refer
to this service as Case Management.
Some of the CIL’s have other funding sources through grants
and private enterprises such as thrift stores,
KACIL supports the Governor’s
proposed budget,
which reinstates 2/3 of the cuts made to the budget starting in July. We recognize the fiscal situation this state
is in at this time and appreciate Governor Sebelius’ attempt to fund minimal
programs.
We ask that
you recognize that even if that budget should be passed, the CIL’s had a rate
reduction of 2.5% last year. The
waiting lists for Home and Community Based Services for people with physical
disabilities are averaging nine months or higher and that is not considering
the allotments put into place in January which virtually halted any access to
the waiting list.
Because the
allotments lowered the protected income level for people using waiver services,
they will have to spend an additional $71.00 per month in order to maintain
services. That may not sound so
terrible, but that leaves them with a whopping $645.00 per month for rent,
utilities, food and transportation. I wonder if any of us could live on
that.
Please
support the Governor’s budget including leaving level of care scores, or the
score which makes you eligible for services at 26. The more you raise those scores, the higher the cost will be to
local communities because the needs will not go away, they will just have to go
to emergency rooms and other local resources.
With the hit that cities and counties have taken in the budget already,
I’m not sure they will be prepared to meet those added costs.
KACIL
supports the goals of the Big Tent Coalition which suggests a revenue enhancing
package that would fully fund all waiting lists for all HCBS Waivers and
restore cuts made to other SRS programs, including but not limited to
Children’s services, Pharmacy, Physician and Hospital reimbursement, and
Employment and Child Care programs.
That means
increasing revenue by $101 million dollars.
That would reinstate programs to where they were before all these
allotments and reductions. That is what
we believe a majority of Kansans want and would accept if it were presented to
them in a positive way. Most
legislators who voted for tax increases last year returned to the
Legislature. Most people can’t even
remember which taxes were raised last year.
But people who continue to get basic services can remember. People who are in crisis can recall that
services were there.
I wonder
when we accepted the idea that the only courageous behavior is to cut
taxes. When will we call it courageous
to recognize the need to raise revenue to meet the basic needs of our most
vulnerable citizens? When will we be
courageous enough to recognize that Government is here to provide services to
the people of the state? When will
respect for life extend beyond the womb?
When will
we finally set public policy to ensure that people can live where they want,
especially when it has been proven time and again that it is cheaper to get
services in the community than it is to get them in facilities?
We realize
that you have a very difficult job to do.
Because of the economy the money is tight and the needs are great. There is no positive change in sight.
And so in
these challenging times we can use the same old tactics. We can engage in debates about what to fund
and where to get the money. We can
assume that SRS has too many staff or takes too many trips. We can point to providers and assume they
get more money than they need. We can
point to consumers and determine that they are getting too much money, or too
many services. But we might as well try
to squeeze blood from a stone.
Advocates
can accuse legislators of letting people die and we can assume that SRS and DOA
are uncaring manipulative organizations who exist to make our lives
miserable.
But we know
full well that people die, not because they are on a waiting list, they die
because of disability or illness. They could have a better quality of life with
services, but you are not the reason they died.
People who
go to work for non profit providers and SRS and DOA generally are trying their
best to maximize funding and resources.
We all have been cut to the bone.
Assuring the health and welfare of people is becoming more difficult.
We can
continue with the same old unproductive behaviors or we can recognize that
those behaviors have not resolved the problem over the years, if in fact, if
they worked, we wouldn’t be here today.
Or we can
courageously identify the need to protect our citizens, to provide services to
those in real need and to ensure that all Kansans have the opportunity to
succeed, in their communities.
KACIL has already outlined some of our ideas for how to
improve the capacity for people to become less dependent on the system. We are, and will continue to work with SRS
to improve options for Medicaid Buy In, and for people getting HCBS Waiver
services.
In addition to the need for funding to provide services for
the waivers, we offer the following recommendations.
1. Encourage SRS to continue to look at the One Waiver
Concept.
2. Close another institution for people with developmental
disabilities.
Thank you for your time, I’d be
happy to stand for questions.
Click here to return to KACIL Home Page