Presentation to
Ways and Means Sub Committee on SRS
Representative Brenda Landwehr, Chair
February 10th, 2003
Thank you for the
opportunity to present to you today regarding the philosophy of independent
living. I am Gina McDonald and I work
for the Kansas Association of Centers for Independent Living (KACIL).
KACIL represents the 13
Centers for Independent Living (CIL’s) around the state. Our mission is to coordinate efforts within
Kansas, the United States, and internationally to the extent that these efforts
will further independent living for all.
KACIL will advocate for the civil rights of Kansans with disabilities,
regardless of age.
CIL’s are community based,
not for profit organizations which are governed by federal and state
requirements that their governing board and a majority of all staff be persons
with disabilities. This concept is
known as consumer control.
The 13 CIL’s in Kansas
provide at least five core services; information and referral, peer support,
independent living skills training, deinstitutionalization and systems and
individual advocacy.
Each CIL, based on input
from consumers in their community and direction of their board may also provide
other services, including, but not limited to payroll agents for self directed
services under the HCBS waivers, assistance and advocacy for transportation,
housing, employment, education, recreation and other areas as defined by people
with disabilities in their area.
Unlike other organizations
who focus on a particular disability or age, CIL’s provide assistance to people
with all disabilities and all ages.
The independent living
movement, which is responsible for the development of CIL’s was an outgrowth of
the civil rights movement. The idea was that we look at disabled people differently
than we had in the past. The following
chart describes the change in thinking that the Independent living movement
proposed and still supports.
THE INDEPENDENT LIVING CHART
|
|
REHAB MODEL |
I.L. MODEL |
|
Definitions Of Problems |
Physical or mental impairments; Something is wrong
with the person |
Dependence of professionals, family members and
others and environments; lack of legal protections or recognition of inherent
worth of disabled people. |
|
Locus Of Problems |
In individual (who is broken or sick and needs
fixing or curing. |
In environments and perceptions. |
|
Social Roles |
Patients, clients, charity recipients,
non-existent. |
Family and community members, customers,
co-workers, advocates, same as anyone else. |
|
Solutions To Problems |
Professional and volunteer interventions and
treatments. |
Equitable employment, political, educational, and
cultural options. |
|
Who Controls |
Professional and / or volunteer. |
Individual or group of individual’s choice. |
|
Desired Outcome |
Fit into the program No social misfits. |
Employment, housing, community involvement, same as
everyone. |
It is our opinion that the
State, in an effort to maximize federal funds, has made “Medicaid Junkies” out
of many people with disabilities and families.
Just as with the welfare system, we have designed a safety net that
traps people and makes them believe they can do little to improve their
situation.
KACIL suggests that in this
time of budget crisis, we begin to revisit the chart and determine what we can
do to empower people, rather than trapping them into dependence. Advocates, consumers, the state and
legislators need to work together to develop solutions that are based on the
dignity and ability of disabled people, not on their deficits.
We need to redesign systems
so that they provide supports when needed and teaching tools whenever possible
to minimize or eliminate dependency on the system and maximize independence.
Our hero in the independent
living movement, Justin Dart Jr. said that “Empowerment is when we say no to
the primitive illusion that society, government, the free market; the public
media are some sort of paternalistic super gods that can give us truth,
equality and prosperity.”
Our freedoms will come not
only when we are released from nursing facilities, but when we are employed
with health care and do not have to worry about our services being cut because
the state is short of funding. We, the
disabled community must work with you to change systems that discriminate, and
minimize us and we must work together to ensure that systems are there as
supports that move us toward independence, not nets that trap and keep us in
costly programs.
How do we accomplish these
grand objectives? The answers will not
be achieved today or tomorrow, but we can take steps to the solutions. KACIL
recommendations include:
1. CONTINUE AND EXPAND THE MEDICAID BUY IN PROGRAM.
This legislature is to be
commended for the great success of the Medicaid Buy In program where people
have the option of returning to employment and can keep their medical card for
health insurance and pay a premium for the card, based on their income.
According to the Working Healthy program, as of January 2nd, 2003,
510 Kansans are taking advantage of the program which began last July. 56% of those people are paying a premium for
their coverage. Most were not
previously working and now are paying taxes.
SRS and advocates have been
working together but have been unable to include Personal Assistance services
as an optional service that people can use under the medical card for this
program. That means that people who use
wheelchairs or need an assistant for other reasons cannot use the program
yet. When we can include personal
assistance as a covered service, the number of people using the program will
increase dramatically. That’s good
news. That means they’ll be working and paying taxes. They’ll be paying
premiums on their medical card.
One of the main barriers to
including PAS is that the federal government will not allow the State to define
“work”. We are advocating that the
definition of who is eligible to receive PAS under this program be people who
work in an integrated work setting for at least 40 hours a month.
Without that definition, a
person on the waiting list for HCBS services could apply to the Medicaid Buy In
program, work one hour a month and be eligible for PAS services. As advocates we recognize that would put the
budget in danger and we are opposed to such a situation. We will advocate for a change in Federal
Regulations, but we ask that this body write to our Senators and Congressmen
and to CMS and to Social Security Administration and request that they allow
for a definition of work as part of the Medicaid Buy In program that will
define work as at least 40 hours per month.
2. Review funding sources for people with
Developmental Disabilities.
There continues to be strong
disincentive for people with mental retardation and other developmental
disabilities to become independent. The
majority of all funding is tied up in matching the waiver using Title XIX
funds. The regulations written around
that funding source give very little options for community providers to be
reimbursed for teaching people to become independent. Rules and regulations encourage and support dependency
models.
KACIL recommends a review of
programs that were implemented by community providers prior to the development
of the current funding systems. There
were programs out there that fostered independence. Direct SRS to provide funding for model programs that are
effective at promoting independence.
They work, but they must be funded.
KACIL believes that current funding can be used. It will require a change in regulations and
in thinking.
We must also look at the invasive and sometimes discriminatory
regulations used as part of the DD Reform Act that prevent Community Based
Agencies from being reimbursed for providing real integrated services for
people with developmental disabilities.
There must be more freedom for people with developmental disabilities to
take risks without the provider agency being held responsible for all actions
of consumers. People learn from their
mistakes, yet for people who we assume have the most difficult time learning,
people with developmental disabilities, don’t have that option. We reward protection and control and by
doing so, minimize the individuals ability to learn, grow and become more
independent.
KACIL is working with Kansas
University, SRS, Community Developmental Disability Organization’s and Self Advocates
Coalition of Kansas to look at ways to create more self directed programs for
people with developmental disabilities.
We received a grant from Health and Human Services under President
Bush’s New Freedom Initiatives. We have
high expectations that we can be successful in identifying some of the barriers
that keep people in programs and do not encourage outcome based services.
This grant only deals with
services for attendants. We hope that SRS will review all regulatory language
and create ways to ensure people have the greatest opportunities for success
and that providers of services are rewarded for outcomes.
SRS took a big step in this
direction with their report, “MAPPING THE FUTURE: EXPLORING POSSIBILITIES.”
3. Transitional Living Services under the PD Waiver.
KACIL has discussed the
option of adding a service called transitional living to the PD Waiver. This
service would allow the opportunity for people to receive training for a period
of time to learn to complete tasks for themselves and then complete waiver
services. This will not work for every
individual, but we believe that some people could reduce their hours of
Personal Assistance Services and some may even be able to leave waiver services.
However, we continue to
identify the need to allow individuals to keep their medical card for health
care needs. If we don’t create that option, people will not be able to leave
the services. The Medicaid Buy In program could be a model for how to implement
this option.
By offering transition
services to people for 6 months with the intent of teaching them to do tasks
themselves or getting OT or PT evaluations to determine equipment which would
allow them to do tasks themselves we will be helping people off the system
instead of teaching them to be dependent on the system.
4. Dollar Follows the Individual from Institutions to
the Community.
This concept is based on the
Olmstead decision by the Supreme Court which says that services should be paid
for in the most integrated setting. If
people with disabilities who are in facilities can benefit from and want to
receive services in the community, they should have the option of moving to the
community.
Currently there is about a
six month waiting list for home and community based services. Even though she has restored cuts made in
the SRS budget, the Governor’s ’04 budget for HCBS has no new dollars to
decrease the size of the waiting list. So we can anticipate it increasing
substantially.
There is no waiting list for
institutional services. If you are in an institution, the state is paying for
your care already, on an average, at a greater rate than what would be required
for services in the community.
This concept would allow
people to move to the community and the dollars would follow them without
having to wait on a waiting list.
It is very difficult to
become independent of the system while living in the community. Your Public policies such as Medicaid Buy In
and HCBS Waivers have made it easier.
Over a year ago, the State
of Kansas was awarded a Real Choice Systems Change grant from HHS for $1.4
million dollars. The purpose of the
grant is to redesign long term care service delivery system. The grant could address waiting list issues
and design a better diversion program before entering a N.F. It should also address the implementation of
the Dollar Following the Individual.
It is impossible to become
independent from a Nursing Facility Bed.
Please study the benefits of the Dollar Following the Individual to free
people who want to move home.
Both Texas and Missouri have
passed similar laws.
5. Review
with Insurance Commissioner methods to make Personal Assistance Services
available, affordable and accessible through Long Term Care and other insurance
Policies.
As our population grows
older and as Medical Science becomes better at keeping us alive and saving us
from accidents, illnesses, the need for Long term Care will only increase. We have done a dis service for years by
talking about Personal Assistance Service and Long Term Care as something
outside and separate from the realm of Health Care. And so we considered it only for elderly and disabled.
We now need to redirect our
efforts to consider Long Term Care including, but not limited to Personal
Assistance Services as Health Care.
We need to work with
Insurance companies, the State, consumers and advocates to identify the
barriers to getting and keeping Long Term Care Insurance today, and develop
methods to make it more affordable, accessible and desirable to people.
As the population of “Baby
Boomers” grows older, they want to “age in place.” That is they want to remain in their homes and continue to be
contributing members of society. Medicare
won’t pay for all the costs. Medicaid
as we’ve seen is killing the State budget.
But Long Term Care Insurance
is unaffordable for people who are just making ends meet. It many times is very limited in the
services and length of time it will provide those services.
Surely there is a way to
solve these major obstacles to people getting the care they need so they can
remain at home, if they choose.
Let’s create some method of
getting everyone to the table to address the issues and develop a plan.
These five recommendations
will move people with disabilities to less dependence on the system that will
and can not always be there. We as a
disability movement will never be free and equal as long as we depend on “other
people’s money”. The Independent Living
philosophy is one of consumer control, not government control. KACIL wants to assist in any way we can to
offer incentives and support to assist people with disabilities to achieve the
same American dream that we all have.
Thank you for the
opportunity to present to you today. I would be happy to stand for questions.
Click
here to return to the KACIL Home Page